Unprofessional Conduct

In 2005 I started acidulate for a tame system and recompense from the start I could take up that in that location was some amateurishism in some of the employees on that point. To me un schoolmaster means non acting as if you were at you place of business or acting as though you be at home or tabu with your friends. That is how the individuals I constituteed with acted however, to me Mrs. Petit did nonhing of the sort. She was non at her place of work she did non pervert any students so I see direct unprofessionalism.What she was doing was having a feeling come onside of work which I mentation we were altogether as citizens entitled to do. When I judge of the word abominable in the context of use of the memoriseing profession I conceptualise of instructors ilk the whizs I worked with tossing approximately the school building talking poorly round the elementary and middle school students they were teaching during school hours.I do take that Mr. or Mrs.Petit acted immor all toldy in the eyes of the federation more(prenominal) or less them flush though they were just living their avow lives for which this enumerationry was founded, just non to the extent that any disparage should deport control to them. Was she teaching the churlren right from wrong? tumesce yes and no, she taught the children with this mishap that it was right to follow your feelings and to be a leader in society non a follower not to go with the norm, that she likewise showed that she had no disregard for the laws of the state she lived in by prison-breaking the law for sexual misconduct.I mass not tied(p) count on my fingers how many a(prenominal) instructors I would halt unstable to teach and Mrs. Petit is not one of them. To me be unfit to teach is a soul that thinks that yelling at children is a good thing, or a teacher that is resulting to put their hands on someones child to enlighten them, or most of the so called teachers now who regard that teaching the children to past a test is preparing them for life.What Mrs. Petit did can not be deemed as a somebody who is unfit to teach, she was proven to be an outstanding teacher and neer sufferinged a student, they were rattling swell educated and that is because of her. In this case the visiting card was justified due to the fact that she was arrested for breaking the law which would cause a fuss for the community whom would of course be shady by this.I personally believe that they had no just cause in terminating her employment because there was no harm to the children and she had erudite her lesson which she could have used as a basis to discourage not only her students but persons in cosmopolitan from doing things that atomic number 18 illegal. I do not think that what one does in there personal lives as long as it does not in any focus transfer into their professional lives should not be the basis for being deemed unfit for their profession or unprofessional in anyway.For modelling if Mr.Carter was a teacher and he neer did anything to harm his students or co-workers and he went to a club on a Friday night, plot of ground at this club he adage a beautiful woman but did not see her plaque and he walked up behind her and utter something resembling hey beautiful you ar feeling beautiful in that dress, the woman turned around at it was a co-worker of his she gets him blast because he made a enlighten at her fleck not at work how is this right? What is this teaching the children? It tells them never to try to get a assignment because it could cost you your job.This example and the story of Mrs. Petit teach children to never have a life outside of work or never get a job that is all it does the rules need to lurch. The difference between the dickens cases was that she got arrested and the opposite person did not. Do I think that it was consistent absolutely not? To me the courts had not taken into considerat ion that the jump on did not prove that she was an unfit teacher they just proved that she had been arrested for being an psyche having fun.She did not harm any of her students, she did not hurt any of her co-workers, she was not on school property and she did not let out the rules of her contract as a teacher unless those rules state that you can not have a life outside of work and if you ar married it must be monogamous. I think that the courts should have state that the only true reason they could pass the sack her was because she now had a criminal register and compensate that should have a alright line because she again did not harm anyone not even her husband because he was there and approved.I think that these so called morals in this boorish are dumb because eachone has their take mind and should be able to decide what is moral and immoral to them without having to live by a streamer of anyone else. The only cartridge clip I think an employer should know what is red on with an employees off the job conduct is when it can directly affect their job or bring harm to other people. If the person has committed a actual wickedness such as murder, child abuse, child molestation, rape, if they are being abused themselves, or involved in other illegal dealings.I think that it is high time society got off of their high horses and agree thinking that they can decide how the person following to them lives their lives. People need to drive off worrying about what religion other people practice, who marries whom, who is eating what and worry about real issues like wherefore are so many of our children are going to bed hungry, why our children are out here committing crimes instead of getting an education, and why there are so many people in the streets because they can not get a job.Those are real issues and until people realize that everyone is created equal and that our forefathers came to this country to get away from all of the turd crap th at was going on elsewhere society leave alone never change it will only get worse. Things will never get better until we as a people better ourselves.No one should be ridiculed for not being as smart as another, for not eating like someone else, for not having the same religion as another, for not being attracted to the sex you think they should be attracted to, or for having an open marriage we were effrontery these minds to think for ourselves not to think like everyone else. The world is not black and uncontaminating it is a rainbow made up of browns, reds, greens, yellows and every other color so I think everyone should be free to do like my religions states harm none, and do what ye will meaning do what you want as long as you do not harm anyone else.Unprofessional Conduct inexpert CONDUCT Introduction Andre Hamilton had spent viii years in the United States spread Force. While in the service, he learned how to conduct himself in a professional manner, and he learned to re spect others. He wanted to become a private instructor so he completed a bachelors degree in constitutional management at the University of LaVerne. after(prenominal) graduating from school, his confidence soared to a point where he matte up he was in a mystify of great demand by potential employers. In 1996, while looking through Sundays foreshorten Enterprise impertinentlyspaper, he saw an ad for a job fair.Thinking of the companies that would be front at the job fair, he resolved to attent. The day of the job fair arrived. His discourses came follow out to both companies, G. M. A. C. and The duty contribute Store. some(prenominal) interviews went extremely well. On Friday, September 27, 1996, Andre was interviewed by Mrs. Jane orchard apple tree from G. M. A. C. , a mortgage company. At the interview, she explained to him the responsibilities of a loan officer, the stake he had applied for. She also asked him questions about what he thought about the company. Mrs. Apple informing him that although the position only paid commisions. Mrs. Apple looked at Andre and said, You have the job if you want it. He tried to hard to contain his happiness. He told her he would accept her offer and thanked her for bounteous him an opportunity. On Monday, September 30, 1996, when he arrived at work, he was greeted and introduced to the staff members and shown around the office. Mrs. Apple told him to relax. Andre began to feel that he had accomplished his tendency of becoming a career person with a good job.Everyone was very hail-fellow-well-met and seemed happy to be employed at that company. What he enjoyed the most about this organization was the team style of leadership displayed by Mrs. Apple. On Tuesday, October 1, 1996, he had second interview with The top executive confer Store. He was interviewed by Mr. Smith, district omnibus, and Maria Smith, human resources director. They were very pleasant and energetic and he got the public opinion that the work environment at The Office hand over Store was the same as at G. M. A. C.After the interview, he was told he had the position and would receive a letter in the mail relative him the information and the inject where he would be working. He stubborn to accept the job offered from The Office Supply Store, because he wanted to move into management. alike at G. M. A. C. , his only income is commision, while at The Office Supply Store, he would have a steady salary. He also likes the close location to his home. The Office Supply Store would train him to manage his own store. On Wednesday, he returned to G. M. A. C. and informed Mrs.Apple that he had been made an offer by The Office Supply Store and he felt it would be a beter opportunity for him. She listened to him and sounded heart-whole when she informed him that she understood why he had come to his decision. Ending the conversation, she told him that if it didnt work out at The Office Supply Store, he should call her a nd she would gladly give him another opportunity. After receiving the letter telling him where to report the work, he arrived at his readying store. Andre was to meet with Mrs. Richards, the general film director, who was also his new boss.When he reached the general omnibuss office, he introduced himself and informed her that he was direct to this store by district coach to take down his management training. Her face begin to flush. She just stared at him and Why are you here? You are supposed to be at the orientation meeting she said sharply. He informed her that according to the letter he received from the district manager and gave it to her. She asked him to have a seat in the break area next to her office, while she straightened out the situation over the phone. He began to get angry at the unpleasant language she was using.He felt this showed a make out lack of professionalism. The more he thought about his reception, the angier he became. He even thought about punchin g her in face or engaging her with some swearing of his own. In looking at come-at-able selections he had in this situation, his first option was definitely to punch her in the face, but he knew that would result in anaesthetize with the police. Another option was just the walk out the door, but he took the positioning that he would overcome this and proceeded to convince himself that this was an dislocated event.He felt this was the Standard grin and make it method of maintaining a job. After he had calmed down, he viewed the situation from a more practical perspective. He told himself that he should credibly just start looking for a new job. He decided he should remain silent on this issue, because he had continuously heard people say throughout the years dont rock the boat. Finally, the last option he thought of was to talk with the district manager about his experience, but the district managers natural reaction would be to defend Mrs.Richards behaviour, and label him wit h an view problem. So he did nothing. Over the next few weeks, the general manager go on to display the same level of behaviour. Andre even tried to communicate with her as two mature adults. To his disappointment, he felt that she appeared uncaring and uncooperative. The problem which is emphasized in this progeny can be explained with main components of attitudes and major job attitudes, responses to dissatisfaction, job rotation, fundamental attribution error, emotional intelligence, and Herzbergs Two-Factor Theory.